Transparency

How Sift makes decisions.

Sift has two shields: scam protection and news source context. This page explains exactly how each one works, what data we use, and where our judgments come from. We think you should know.

Shield 1

Scam Detection

Sift's scam detection runs on every page you visit and checks three things independently. All analysis happens locally in your browser — no data is sent anywhere.

1. Known scam domain list

We maintain a list of domains confirmed to host scam content — tech support fraud, fake prize pages, IRS impersonation, and similar schemes. If you visit one of these domains, Sift immediately shows a high-severity warning.

2. URL structure analysis

Sift analyzes the URL of every page for patterns common in phishing attacks, even on domains not in our list:

3. Page content phrase scanning

Sift scans the visible text on the page for language patterns characteristic of common scams, grouped by category:

Tech support fraud

"Your computer has been infected", fake Windows Defender alerts, instructions not to close the browser, phone numbers presented as Microsoft or Apple support.

Fake prizes & rewards

"You have been selected", "claim your free gift", gift card payment requests, sweepstakes that require personal information to claim.

Government impersonation

IRS arrest warrant threats, Social Security suspension notices, Medicare card update requests, fake tax debt demands.

Financial fraud

Requests to verify bank account or credit card numbers, suspicious SSN requests, get-rich-quick investment promises, fake account suspension threats.

Important limitation: Sift catches known patterns, not every possible scam. New scam tactics emerge constantly. Sift is a first layer of protection — if something feels wrong, always stop and call a family member before providing any information or payment.

Shield 2

News Source Context

When you visit a news site or social platform in our database, Sift shows a banner with the source's bias rating and factual accuracy — and links to how AP News, Reuters, and PBS are covering the same story.

How we classify sources

Each source is assigned a bias category and a factual accuracy rating by evaluating it against a fixed set of criteria (below). These ratings are Sift's opinion — not statements of objective fact — and reasonable people may disagree with any individual rating. We are automating this classification using AI so that ratings stay current as sources change and emerge.

Category What it means
Far right Strong conservative bias; frequently publishes misleading or unverified claims
Right-leaning Conservative bias in framing and story selection; factual accuracy varies
Left-leaning Liberal bias in framing and story selection; factual accuracy varies
Far left Strong liberal bias; frequently publishes misleading or one-sided claims
Conspiracy / unreliable Regularly publishes false, fabricated, or pseudoscientific content
Foreign state-affiliated Funded or substantially controlled by a foreign government and operating primarily as a vehicle for state messaging — distinct from editorially-independent public broadcasters
Social platform User-generated content with no editorial oversight — anyone can post

How ratings are generated

Ratings are produced by evaluating publicly available information about each outlet against a consistent set of criteria. This classification is being automated using AI so that ratings can be refreshed as sources change and emerge:

The system is calibrated against the public methodologies of the established media-analysis organisations below, and the ratings are refreshed regularly so they keep pace with new and changing sources. As a safeguard, major outlets with consistently high factual-accuracy records are never automatically flagged.

Media Bias / Fact Check
Rates sources on political bias and factual reporting quality
AllSides
Blind surveys of politically diverse panels to rate bias
Ad Fontes Media
Rates reliability and bias using teams of analysts across the spectrum
NewsGuard
Credibility ratings based on journalistic standards criteria

Why we don't flag centrist or mainstream sources

Sources like CNN, NBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post have acknowledged left-leaning tendencies in framing and story selection. We do not currently flag them because their factual accuracy ratings remain high across the analysis organisations we reference, and because the goal of Sift is to protect against misinformation — not to flag every source with a viewpoint.

We may add context for centrist sources in a future update, presented differently to reflect the distinction between bias and inaccuracy.


What Sift doesn't do

Suggesting a correction or addition

If you believe a source is incorrectly rated, missing from our database, or if you've encountered a scam pattern we're not catching, we want to hear from you.

Submit feedback via our support form →